Skip to main content

The Invention of Heterosexuality (Katz, 1990)



These are the questions we will discuss in class Wednesday. 


1. Prior to the coining of heterosexuality as a term, what qualities described “true” women and men? How were these qualities specific to race and class?

2. How did an economic and labor shift in the late 19th century result in a change of how we relate to our bodies? In what ways did this lead to a medicalization of “Normal Love”?

3. We have discussed discipline and deviance in relation to ascribed identity norms. How does the invention of the category of heterosexuality intersect with how we have talked about deviance?

4. What were the specific communicative impacts of a new heterosexual category?

5.  At the beginning of the article, Katz uses the word “ahistorical.” Near the end of the essay, he talks about the importance of a “historical” view of the hetero- and homo- labels attached to sexuality. What is going on here? What is an ahistorical view of heterosexuality compared to a historical view? Why does it matter?


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

*Trans Bodies & Communities

For our reading on moving  beyond  the  binary , we set the tone with clips about the critically acclaimed FX series  Pose , which centers the experience of trans* women of color. The Daily Show clip provides some context and background with one of the series' writers and director, Janet Mock. The next clip features starts of the series discussing the importance of representation, which we can link to the  increased  levels of suicidal ideation in trans* communities, as well as  violence  on trans* bodies..

The "Achievement Gap"

For today's reading on the achievement gap and education debt, we will discuss the video below, as well as an article from the Everyday Feminism blog. The reading addresses that white women have benefited the most from affirmative action. Research confirms the argument that gender was a "blindspot" in the original design of affirmative action policies. Ch. 33, “From the Achievement Gap to the Education Debt: Understanding Achievement in U.S. Schools,” Gloria Ladson-Billings Ladson-Billings addresses the “achievement gap,” a catchphrase to describe the difference in academic performance between White, minority, and lower socio-economic status students. This gap has been found to be most significantly affected by race and ethnicity, with a brief review of some of the potential causes. Ladson-Billings suggests avoiding too much focus on the gap, because most of the solutions are short-term in nature, and instead to look at the longer standing “educational debt” akin...

The "Model" Minority Myth and Stereotypes of Asian American Communities

For our last reading and discussion topic this semester, it is significant that we were planning to discuss stereotypes of Asian Americans during our last week, even prior to the increased racism perpetuated on Asian Americans following misperceptions of COVID-19. As with earlier posts, please read through the material from all the links (including the one in the previous sentence) and view the included videos to contribute in an informed, respectful conversation below or on the Scholar discussion forum. We begin with a screening of this clip sharing some of the history in which the myth of Asian Americans as the " model minority " emerged. An article from the Urban Institute illuminates some of the economic realities that debunk the myth. Research published by the National Association of Independents Schools provides tools to intervene in the myth from an education context. Highlights from Ch. 39:   “Are Asian Americans Becoming ‘White’”? by Min Zhou: Zhou ...