Skip to main content

Thoughts from ch. 22 on racism, heterosexism, and black sexuality



“Prisons for Our Bodies, Closets for Our Minds: Racism, Heterosexism, and Black Sexuality,” Patricia Hill Collins
Patricia Hill Collins considers the intersecting relationship between racism and heterosexism. She argues that the assumption that these two hegemonic ideologies represent separate systems of oppression obscures the fact that racism and sexism rely upon each other for meaning. Without sacrificing the acknowledgement of differences in the way that racism and heterosexism manifest, the author shows that the two systems converge and that both systems affect the everyday lives of all people.

In class we attempted to answer the following questions. Since we didn't get to all of them, I encourage you to make comments here answering one of the questions. I am particularly interested in responses to no. 2 and 3 since we ran out of time for this in the 10 am class.


1.     Discuss the ways in which heterosexism and racism are linked, historically, according to Patricia Hill Collins.
2.     The author writes that, “Sakia and her friends share with all women the vulnerabilities that accrue to women who negotiate public space.” Discuss what she means by the phrase “negotiate public space.” How was Sakia negotiating space? Do you agree that all women share the vulnerability the author describes? Why or why not?
3.     Discuss the differences and similarities between the stigmatizing and deviancy associated with Black sexuality and the stigmatizing and deviancy associated with LBGT sexuality, according to the author.
4.     Discuss how binary thinking produces hegemonic ideologies. How else might we think about race and sexuality in order not to support such ideologies?
5.     On what basis does the author argue that marriage regulation has been “needed” when it has been imposed? What conditions do you think the author believes would have been necessary for such regulation not to have been needed by those who imposed it?



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What do stereotypes of immigrant criminalization and mass incarceration communicate about race/gender/class?

42. “The Myth of Immigrant Criminality and the Paradox of Assimilation,” Rubén G. Rumbaut and Walter Ewing Although some of you may not have access to the book, the information in that short reading is available from the American Immigration Council . In a post-9/11 climate of fear and ignorance, assumptions have flourished that immigration and criminality are associated. However, systematic evidence shows that crime is not caused or even aggravated by immigrants to the United States, regardless of their legal status. Crime rates in the nation have declined even at the same time that immigration rates have increased. Among all ethnic groups in the United States, immigrants have lower incarceration rates than those who are native-born. For all ethnic groups, incarceration rates are highest among high school dropouts, yet immigrants who are high school dropouts have lower incarceration rates than other high school dropouts. Although immigrants’ risk of incarceration increases the l...

Controlling Images of Asian and Asian American Women

For today's reading on the "controlling images" and racialized femininities of Asian American Women, you watched a video (included below) to get a historical understanding of early media images. In class we watched the following video for a more modern perspective. To bring the conversation into a current context, an article about  "the Asian mean girl"  might be productive.

Controlling Images of Latinos and Native Americans

The two readings assigned for Wednesday's discussion extended earlier conversations about controlling images and media representations. Read the summaries and click on the links to read/skim and/or view the supplemental materials for your comments.  Please note, this is not optional. All students are required to post a comment or a question for each post. From Ch. 46: In life history interviews with Latino men, Vasquez-Tokos and Norton-Smith found two recurrent themes: gangs and sports. Most respondents had not been involved in either gangs or sports, but they felt forcibly constrained by these  controlling images , which had limited their educational opportunities, access to jobs, and sense of self-expression. Whereas prejudice involves negative emotions and stereotypes, controlling images are systemic and cultural instruments of power. They are not individual ideas, but rather ideological collective  representations  that offer “strategies of action” that bri...