Skip to main content

Contemporary Families

The course blog post for this entry seems to have some technical visibility issues when published that I cannot fix. This same post is in the Scholar Discussion Forum .
Highlights from Ch. 30 “LGBT Sexuality and Families at the Start of the Twenty-First Century,” Mignon R. Moore and Michael Stambolis-Ruhstorfer
Moore and Stambolis-Ruhstorfer review and summarize current research literature on LGBT families. Major research streams include research into the politics of defining family to include same-sex couples, population characteristics of same-sex parent families, and the legal and cultural challenges faced by parents and children in same-sex partner families. A few key findings they highlight include:
  • Continued public ambivalence in the United States toward the inclusion of same-sex couples in definitions of families
  • An increasing number of lesbian- and gay-parent families in the United States
  • Same-sex parenting as more common in the South, in working class families, and among
    racial minorities
  • Increased poverty rates for same-sex parent families, with poverty rates for children in
    lesbian and gay households twice those of children in heterosexual married couple
    households
  • A generational shift in lesbian and gay parenting toward “planned families” through
    donor insemination, surrogacy, and/or adoption
  • Continuing legal uncertainty around parenting rights for same-sex parents
  • Direct and indirect forms of stigmatization for same-sex parents and their children
  • Better outcomes for children living in areas that are more supportive of LGBT
    populations and that have antidiscrimination laws to protect sexual minority populations
The video below updates the current literature with a discussion of trans-parenting.
Here or on the Scholar Discussion Board please post a comment or question that arose for you in reading/viewing this content as it relates to gender/race/class communication issues.

If you are able to, please comment here. Otherwise, please place your comment in the appropriate Scholar Discussion board thread (it is available in the Course Content Forum). The deadline is 11:59 pm Sunday, April 12. Early next week I will either share a written post or YouTube summary of my notes if any responses still leave out important info we would have covered in person.

I ask that you please read through your classmates' comments here and on the forums and maybe even reply to a comment or two (on either format, up to you!) in the interest of keeping it interactive.

Comments

  1. AnonymousApril 4, 2020 at 2:56 PM

    "Authenticity doesn't mean comfortable, it means managing and negotiating the discomfort of every day life." What a powerful quote from the TEDTalk speaker to capture the external and internal strife people face every day to live their most true selves. It poses as a reminder that if may not share the same identity, we are still called to "confront the assumptions and affirm the existence" of those that society proclaims are different than us; different in a way that "others" the identity markers that are lived out with a desire to lead an authentic life. It's unique and helpful to discover stories from individuals with such identity markers different from us in attempt to understand and "affirm their existence."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AnonymousApril 9, 2020 at 7:46 PM

      I agree, the discussion about comfortability in the Ted Talk was moving because it represented societal perceptions of trans parents, and the internal perceptions of these parents. One thing that really stood out to me relating to comfortability was "Authenticity doesn't mean comfortability". There is always a choice to be made and for transparents that choice is often times illuminated and magnified through a lense of gender norms carried out by society. As we discussed in class, gender is a social construct that has been found to manifest in an explicit and implicit way. Society defines gender simply through the use of color, they associate green, blue, and red with boys and men, and pink, yellow, and purple with girls and women. This forces individuals who do not fit into these specific boxes to fall outside of the gender binary. It is second nature for people to choose option one in hopes of avoiding confrontation and uncomfortable questions. However, for transparents, them as well as their kids and partners will benefit so much more from choosing option two because it allows them the opportunity to respect themselves and validate themselves in a way that society refuses to.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

*Trans Bodies & Communities

For our reading on moving  beyond  the  binary , we set the tone with clips about the critically acclaimed FX series  Pose , which centers the experience of trans* women of color. The Daily Show clip provides some context and background with one of the series' writers and director, Janet Mock. The next clip features starts of the series discussing the importance of representation, which we can link to the  increased  levels of suicidal ideation in trans* communities, as well as  violence  on trans* bodies..
Post a Comment
Read more

The "Achievement Gap"

For today's reading on the achievement gap and education debt, we will discuss the video below, as well as an article from the Everyday Feminism blog. The reading addresses that white women have benefited the most from affirmative action. Research confirms the argument that gender was a "blindspot" in the original design of affirmative action policies. Ch. 33, “From the Achievement Gap to the Education Debt: Understanding Achievement in U.S. Schools,” Gloria Ladson-Billings Ladson-Billings addresses the “achievement gap,” a catchphrase to describe the difference in academic performance between White, minority, and lower socio-economic status students. This gap has been found to be most significantly affected by race and ethnicity, with a brief review of some of the potential causes. Ladson-Billings suggests avoiding too much focus on the gap, because most of the solutions are short-term in nature, and instead to look at the longer standing “educational debt” akin...
Post a Comment
Read more

The "Model" Minority Myth and Stereotypes of Asian American Communities

For our last reading and discussion topic this semester, it is significant that we were planning to discuss stereotypes of Asian Americans during our last week, even prior to the increased racism perpetuated on Asian Americans following misperceptions of COVID-19. As with earlier posts, please read through the material from all the links (including the one in the previous sentence) and view the included videos to contribute in an informed, respectful conversation below or on the Scholar discussion forum. We begin with a screening of this clip sharing some of the history in which the myth of Asian Americans as the " model minority " emerged. An article from the Urban Institute illuminates some of the economic realities that debunk the myth. Research published by the National Association of Independents Schools provides tools to intervene in the myth from an education context. Highlights from Ch. 39:   “Are Asian Americans Becoming ‘White’”? by Min Zhou: Zhou ...
16 comments
Read more