Skip to main content

Contemporary Families

The course blog post for this entry seems to have some technical visibility issues when published that I cannot fix. This same post is in the Scholar Discussion Forum .
Highlights from Ch. 30 “LGBT Sexuality and Families at the Start of the Twenty-First Century,” Mignon R. Moore and Michael Stambolis-Ruhstorfer
Moore and Stambolis-Ruhstorfer review and summarize current research literature on LGBT families. Major research streams include research into the politics of defining family to include same-sex couples, population characteristics of same-sex parent families, and the legal and cultural challenges faced by parents and children in same-sex partner families. A few key findings they highlight include:
  • Continued public ambivalence in the United States toward the inclusion of same-sex couples in definitions of families
  • An increasing number of lesbian- and gay-parent families in the United States
  • Same-sex parenting as more common in the South, in working class families, and among
    racial minorities
  • Increased poverty rates for same-sex parent families, with poverty rates for children in
    lesbian and gay households twice those of children in heterosexual married couple
    households
  • A generational shift in lesbian and gay parenting toward “planned families” through
    donor insemination, surrogacy, and/or adoption
  • Continuing legal uncertainty around parenting rights for same-sex parents
  • Direct and indirect forms of stigmatization for same-sex parents and their children
  • Better outcomes for children living in areas that are more supportive of LGBT
    populations and that have antidiscrimination laws to protect sexual minority populations
The video below updates the current literature with a discussion of trans-parenting.
Here or on the Scholar Discussion Board please post a comment or question that arose for you in reading/viewing this content as it relates to gender/race/class communication issues.

If you are able to, please comment here. Otherwise, please place your comment in the appropriate Scholar Discussion board thread (it is available in the Course Content Forum). The deadline is 11:59 pm Sunday, April 12. Early next week I will either share a written post or YouTube summary of my notes if any responses still leave out important info we would have covered in person.

I ask that you please read through your classmates' comments here and on the forums and maybe even reply to a comment or two (on either format, up to you!) in the interest of keeping it interactive.

Comments

  1. AnonymousApril 4, 2020 at 2:56 PM

    "Authenticity doesn't mean comfortable, it means managing and negotiating the discomfort of every day life." What a powerful quote from the TEDTalk speaker to capture the external and internal strife people face every day to live their most true selves. It poses as a reminder that if may not share the same identity, we are still called to "confront the assumptions and affirm the existence" of those that society proclaims are different than us; different in a way that "others" the identity markers that are lived out with a desire to lead an authentic life. It's unique and helpful to discover stories from individuals with such identity markers different from us in attempt to understand and "affirm their existence."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AnonymousApril 9, 2020 at 7:46 PM

      I agree, the discussion about comfortability in the Ted Talk was moving because it represented societal perceptions of trans parents, and the internal perceptions of these parents. One thing that really stood out to me relating to comfortability was "Authenticity doesn't mean comfortability". There is always a choice to be made and for transparents that choice is often times illuminated and magnified through a lense of gender norms carried out by society. As we discussed in class, gender is a social construct that has been found to manifest in an explicit and implicit way. Society defines gender simply through the use of color, they associate green, blue, and red with boys and men, and pink, yellow, and purple with girls and women. This forces individuals who do not fit into these specific boxes to fall outside of the gender binary. It is second nature for people to choose option one in hopes of avoiding confrontation and uncomfortable questions. However, for transparents, them as well as their kids and partners will benefit so much more from choosing option two because it allows them the opportunity to respect themselves and validate themselves in a way that society refuses to.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Black Feminism and Hashtag Activism

53. “(Re)Imagining Intersectional Democracy from Black Feminism to Hashtag Activism,” Sarah J. Jackson Sarah J. Jackson - #Hashtag Activism: The Rise and Influence of Networked Counterpublics from Engagement Lab on Vimeo . Jackson writes about the intersectional lessons of the Black Lives Matter movement, which can be traced to the legacy of the larger Black freedom movement and also to the more recent work of millennial Black activist organizations like the Dream Defenders and the Black Youth Project 100. These recent movements have been created or heavily influenced by Black feminist principles. Millennial movements have eschewed the respectability politics that guided the civil rights movement of the 1950s and 1960s and have worked instead to center the voices, experiences, and knowledge of those most often at the margins. Black Lives Matter, founded by Alicia Garza, Opal Tometi, and Patrisse Cullors, has insisted on radical intersectionality: Garza writes that the org...
16 comments
Read more

Contemporary Families Part Two

32. “Loving Across Racial Divides,” Amy Steinbugler In spite of dramatic positive shifts in public attitudes toward racial intermarriage, only a small percentage of people in the United States date and marry across racial lines. Steinbugler’s research explores the ways that race impacts daily life for interracial couples, finding that racism continues to shape everyday life in three primary ways. First, because of racial neighborhood segregation, many interracial couples face challenges of belonging and ease in residential spaces. Second, in spite of intimate relationships, interracial couples may not share the same perspectives on race and racism: White partners in  interracial relationships  can reflect the attitudes of many White Americans who question the scope and severity of contemporary racism. Finally, interracial couples sometimes reflect the power of racial-gender stereotypes within their relationships. Some highlights: Current public attitudes toward racial ...
16 comments
Read more

#WhyIStayed and intersectional intimate partner violence narratives

The National Coalition Against Domestic Violence compiles facts about the prevalence of DV in the United States, including these statistics . Gendered violence must be examined through a lens of intersectionality if we are to have more compassionate communication about victim/survivors, as well as abusers. We read Rosemary Clark 's 2016 essay from Feminist Media Studies about hashtag activism in the context of domestic violence. Below is a short news clip about one of the viral stories that ignited the #WhyIStayed online movement. Here or on the Scholar Discussion Board be prepared to discuss one of the following questions: 1. How is intimate partner violence an important issue for gender/race/class and feminist discussion? 2. What dominant discourses exist around DV? 3. How does hashtag activism invite intersectional feminist organizing? 4. What outcomes did #WhyIStayed lead to? Please note, this is not optional. All students are required to post a comment or...
23 comments
Read more